Bassey is hugely critical of Lord Skidelsky's assumption
that educational research is a single concept that can only be studied by a
group of researchers who work externally to the field they are studying. The
study of 'educational research' as plural concept enables a transient phase of
understanding. I, too, am critical of the assertion that Skidelsky has
'stud[ied] professionally much of the research that has taken place' informing
his decisions to move all research to the TDA. This ignores the ability to
cover research questions that may be difficult to bring in to the public light. He believes that educational research should be its on
subset of a larger group of research disciplines; that it should have a close link
to practice and aim to improve educational action via informing educational
judgements and decisions, thereby illustrating the functional purpose of
research. The outcomes should come by way of improvements in learning.
This is contrasted with the other discipline-based research,
which Bassey makes distinct. He states the psychological, sociological, philosophical,
historical and economic research are research on education by stating that
these are focussed on examining specific phenomena involved in educational
processes and their settings. I disagree with this, as I believe that all
these disciplines are education and education is part of them; to make them
completely distinct means we will always be infringing on one discipline or
another. For example, when we study 'peer pressure and it's effects on
learning', we are looking through a social discipline, when we question the
practice of teaching maths in the classroom, we must look at previous history
of mathematics teaching.
When amalgamating all teachers within the box of only being
able to offer 'personal theories' using David Tripp (1993)'s statement 'most
academic educational knowledge is of very little use to teachers and that
teachers' knowledge and understanding of their practice is seriously
under-represented and discounted in the university discipline of education.' to
support this, I feel confusion and anger. What is the point of me undertaking
this Masters study if all I need is teaching practice, practical experience? Is
this all a narcissistic and futile activity?
Even Dylan Wiliam (cited in Lipsett, 2008), deputy director of the Institute of
Education states the Masters study needed to have a practical focus, so teachers
could see how to use what they learn in their classrooms.
"Research shows that current masters degrees do not
appear to make people better teachers and there is no relationship between
those that hold them and children progressing any quicker," he said.
"The masters needs to be practical and focused on
making people the best teachers and not filling their heads full of educational
theory."
So now we have William stating that teachers need not to be
filled with 'educational theory' and Bassey claiming that by being led by
professional discourse and everyday experiences, teachers can only offer
'personal theory'. Surely having both personal and
educational theory makes can aid in strengthening the competency of teachers. I agree with Bassey in the sense
that purely 'personal theory' cannot fully inform educational action yet, like William I believe that those whose heads are filled with 'educational
theory' do not a better teacher make.
My experiences and professional discourse with colleagues
form the predominant understanding of my teaching practice, however, the
training and reading I have obtained and will obtain from this study allow me
to be reflective about what it is actually easy I am understanding. It allows
me to place my understanding within the stratosphere of other teachers and
staff within the educational field.
This is why I am undertaking the MEd. It will allow me to input all my sources of knowledge into my practice.
References
Bassey, M. (2007) ‘On the kinds of research in educational settings’ in Hammersley, M. (ed) (2007) Educational Research and Evidence-Based Practice, Milton Keynes, The Open University pp. 141–50
Hammersley, M. (ed) (2007) Educational Research and Evidence-Based Practice, Milton Keynes, The Open University
Lipsett, A. (2008) 'New teachers to follow masters programme', The Guardian [Online], Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/mar/07/highereducation.teachertraining Accessed on: 7th Oct 2011
References
Bassey, M. (2007) ‘On the kinds of research in educational settings’ in Hammersley, M. (ed) (2007) Educational Research and Evidence-Based Practice, Milton Keynes, The Open University pp. 141–50
Hammersley, M. (ed) (2007) Educational Research and Evidence-Based Practice, Milton Keynes, The Open University
Lipsett, A. (2008) 'New teachers to follow masters programme', The Guardian [Online], Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/mar/07/highereducation.teachertraining Accessed on: 7th Oct 2011
No comments:
Post a Comment